Foxbase 2.0 performance
Ed Hew
edhew at xenitec.on.ca
Wed Nov 29 15:45:50 AEST 1989
In article <9210 at spool.cs.wisc.edu> thurm at shorty.cs.wisc.edu (Matthew Thurmaier) writes:
>FoxBASE+ 2.10 Performance is FAR greater than foxbase 1.04, provided you
>are running compiled. It still has some bugs though.
SCO now has (as of about 2 months ago) fox+ 2.1.1a available. It's
a minor upgrade for registered 2.1.0 owners. We carry it in stock
(at work), so I would assume that most SCO 3rd level resellers would
have it. You do have to provide the serial number, in return for
which you get some useful buggy-fixes.
>Matthew J. Thurmaier ...decvax!garp!harvard!uwvax!thurm
>The Computer Classroom matt at shorty.cs.wisc.edu
Ed. A. Hew Authorized Technical Trainer Xeni/Con Corporation
work: edhew at xenicon.uucp -or- ..!{uunet!}utai!lsuc!xenicon!edhew
->home: edhew at xenitec.on.ca -or- ..!{uunet!}watmath!xenitec!edhew
# Justice is only relative to what you can afford to prove in court.
More information about the Comp.unix.xenix
mailing list